Will someone please get Cory Booker a tissue? The senator from New Jersey claims that President Trump’s alleged “sh*thole countries” remark made him cry.
Yes, cry. This one-time All-American high school football star was so butthurt over a completely uncontroversial statement that he actually shed tears. Then he choked up again while recounting his first bout of weeping.
“I hurt,” whined Booker before pounding his fists on the bench like a small child. “When Dick Durbin called me I had tears of rage when I heard about this experience in this meeting.”
Booker was referring to the ultraliberal Illinois senator who claims to have been in a meeting with President Trump when Trump said that America doesn’t need any more immigrants from “sh*thole countries” such as Haiti and El Salvador, and the entirety of Africa. He allegedly said that he would prefer Norwegians instead.
This set off a round of denials and counteraccusations. President Trump, Secretary of Homeland Security Kirstjen Nielsen, and two Republican senators have denied that Trump made the remarks while Durbin doubled down on his previous accusation.
On the one hand it sounds like something Trump would say, particularly if he were speaking off the record, while on the other hand liberal Democrats are constantly manufacturing incidents of faux outrage so that they can virtue signal to their base. Liberals need to be seen as vigilant warriors, fighting a never-ending battle against “hate,” which requires an endless stream of outrages. It’s really tiresome.
Of course when the Democrats are in outrage mode so too are the news media — likely because there’s no clear demarcation line between the two. In the 24-hour period after Sh*tholegate broke, CNN used the term on air 195 times. That’s an average of more than eight times per hour. Wasn’t there any other news to cover?
It should be noted that this whole story may still be apocryphal. The fact that the news media present it as truth is a classic case of media bias. One Democrat is to be believed because he’s a Democrat. Four Republicans are not to be believed because they’re Republicans.
But if the president didn’t say what Durbin claims he said then I’ll say it for him. Haiti is a “sh*thole,” and everyone knows it — even Dick Durbin, Cory Booker, and all their whiny reporter friends over at CNN. El Salvador is also a “sh*thole.” So is every African nation without exception.
That may be an impolitic thing to say, but that doesn’t make it any less true. If we intend to craft a reality-based immigration policy, we must retain the ability to speak candidly about the world as it actually exists — particularly in closed door meetings for cripe’s sake! That’s what closed door meetings are for. We can’t have candid conversations if little Dicky Durbin is going to tattle to the media every time he feels a case of the butthurt coming on.
Even liberals know that Haiti, El Salvador, and Africa are “sh*tholes.” In fact, it seems to be their recurring argument for why we need to prioritize citizens of those nations in our immigration policy. Turning away people who are fleeing the kind of violence, corruption, and disease found in such places would be heartless and frankly un-American!
Then they react with righteous indignation if anyone calls them “sh*thole countries.” Seriously? If they’re not sh*tholes, then their residents have no special case to plead.
But Haitians receive preferential treatment under our immigration policy precisely because their homeland is a shambles — and anyone who tries to end this preferential treatment gets his hand slapped by the liberal media.
In June of last year, President Trump openly considered ending the “temporary” refugee status of some 50,000 Haitians who were allowed to stay in the U.S. after that country’s 2010 earthquake.
A staff editorial from the Washington Post explained:
The Haitians in question have been allowed to stay in the United States … as beneficiaries of a U.S. government program called Temporary Protected Status. TPS extends humanitarian relief to people from impoverished, war-torn or disaster-wracked countries who are already in the United States when calamity strikes their homelands. [Emphasis added.]
Sounds like “sh*tholes” to me!
The editorial went on to bemoan the cruelty of the Trump administration for daring to send 50,000 people back to a country that is, by their description, “a special hardship case.” That’s a diplomatic way of saying that it’s a sh*thole.
The Post also admitted that Haiti will be a “special hardship case” for years to come:
It’s fair to wonder whether there will ever be, in the foreseeable future, a right time to send more than 50,000 Haitians back to a country so beset with chronic problems. The honest answer is no. …
For once the Post said something that makes sense. Haiti will almost certainly remain the pity of the world for as long as my unborn grandchildren’s unborn grandchildren are alive and would still be even if there had never been an earthquake. For that matter, the nation has been a “special hardship case” since its birth in 1804 and probably before that too. Haiti was, is, and ever shall be a horrible place filled with despotism, disease, and grinding poverty.
In other words, it’s a “sh*thole.” Saying that makes liberals nervous, of course, because it implies that not all cultures are equal, from which they draw their own racial conclusions. But it’s the truth.
Let’s look at infant mortality rates. Besides Afghanistan which has the world’s highest infant mortality rate, the top 24 highest infant mortality rates can all be found in African nations. The top 35 nations are all African except four. Then comes Haiti at number 36. El Salvador is number 96. Norway by contrast is number 221.
Or we could examine per capita GDP. Haiti’s is a mere $1,800, which makes it number 209 of 230 countries and the lowest in the Americas. Of the 21 countries that rank below Haiti, two are small Pacific island nations and one is North Korea. All the rest are African. Norway is the thirteenth highest.
So why all the weeping and fist-pounding about some nations being called “sh*tholes?” The short answer is that liberals prioritize their feelings above all else. Cory Booker, for example, might be a little sensitive about the term “sh*thole” because it’s often associated with the state he represents in the U.S. Senate. New Jersey has a certain reputation as a toxic waste dump with syringe-strewn beaches.
I wouldn’t make that argument, of course, because I know that only part of the state fits that description. The entire Garden State isn’t like the really dumpy sections found across the Hudson from Manhattan in places like East Rutherford, Irvington, and Newark.
Say, wasn’t Cory Booker once the mayor of Newark? Yes, he was.
Newark also has a significant population of Haitian immigrants. Remember the ’90s hip hop ensemble the Fugees? Two of its three members were Haitian refugees who settled in the Newark area. Newark also has a good-sized population of Salvadorans. The Archdiocese of Newark estimates that forty thousand Salvadorans live within its jurisdictional bounds.
But is Newark a “sh*thole” because of its Haitian and Salvadoran populations? Not necessarily. Newark has never been a nice place to live — not even before waves of Haitian and Salvadoran immigrants arrived. Still, they haven’t done much to spruce the place up.
A better explanation would be that the Haitians and Salvadorans landed in Newark because they were priced out of nicer communities. They then settled right into the urban Democratic wasteland. Politicians like Cory Booker pander to them and try to buy their votes with promises of government goodies. These politicians never solve their problems, of course, but that’s to be expected. If they did, what would they run on next time?
In short, if Cory Booker is offended at all by Trump’s alleged comments, it’s because they strike a nerve — not because they’re untrue. As the former mayor of a “sh*thole” city, filled with constituents who hail from some of the “sh*thole” countries Trump allegedly named, Booker takes the remarks as a personal insult.
Or at least he pretends to. In reality he secretly agrees with the remarks; he just has to feign overwrought outrage publicly for the sake of Newark’s and New Jersey’s sacred honor.
But the rest of us have no obligation to pretend that Haiti, El Salvador, and Africa are nice places. They’re not. Anyone who believes that they are can prove his sincerity by taking his next vacation in beautiful, sunny Port-au-Prince. All others can quit the histrionics.