Seemingly overdue: NYT adds fact-checker position to D.C. Bureau

Seemingly overdue: NYT adds fact-checker position to D.C. Bureau

[Ed. – This is a nod to new media.  Reporters and news organizations can’t get away anymore with sloppy fact-checking for their articles.  There’s always someone to call them out, when they botch easily checked collateral facts.]

With greater scrutiny on media accuracy than ever, The New York Times has added a new, never-before-heard-of position to its D.C. bureau: fact-checker.

“Given how much copy we’re moving these days, given how intense the atmosphere is, we’re just doubling down on making sure everything is as airtight as it can be,” said Peter Baker, the Times’ chief White House correspondent. “It’s probably long overdue.”

Though fact-checkers are common at magazines, including The New York Times Magazine, they are all but unheard of at newspapers or breaking news sites. Baker said that, in his nearly 30-year run at the Times and Washington Post, he had never come across one. Bill Grueskin, a Columbia Journalism School professor who previously worked as one of The Wall Street Journal’s top editors, said he also had never heard of the position at a newspaper.

Trending: Cartoon bonus: Happy Birthday, Mr. President!

Continue reading →

For your convenience, you may leave commments below using either the Spot.IM commenting system or the Facebook commenting system. If Spot.IM is not appearing for you, please disable AdBlock to leave a comment.

Commenting Policy

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please hover over that comment, click the ∨ icon, and mark it as spam. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.