NY Times reporter: Trump offers ‘wish fulfillment’ for right-wing media’s conspiracy nuts

NY Times reporter: Trump offers ‘wish fulfillment’ for right-wing media’s conspiracy nuts
Olympus has fallen.

Back in 1995, the Clinton White House produced a 332-page packet for media friends that was badly titled “Communication Stream of Conspiracy Commerce.” It charged a “right-wing conspiracy industry” spread fictions about the Clintons.

Conservatives might easily think of that when perusing Jonathan Martin’s New York Times piece from Wednesday, headlined “As Donald Trump Pushes Conspiracy Theories, Right-Wing Media Gets Its Wish.” Don’t they love to put “conspiracy theories” and “right-wing media” in the same headline?

Martin’s beginning seems a bit obtuse:

WASHINGTON — Ever since talk radio, cable news and the Internet emerged in the 1990s as potent political forces on the right, Republicans have used those media to attack their opponents through a now-familiar two-step.

Political operatives would secretly place damaging information with friendly media like The Drudge Report and Fox News and with radio hosts like Rush Limbaugh — and then they would work to get the same information absorbed into the mainstream media.

Candidates themselves would avoid being seen slinging mud, if possible, so as to avoid coming across as undignified or desperate.

Do Martin and the Times really believe this is a unique process, that the Clintons never place “damaging information with friendly media” without their fingerprints? Are they somehow pretending to be unaware of other examples — say, a bartender secretly videotaping a Mitt Romney speech in 2012 about the “47 percent” and leaking to the leftist magazine Mother Jones so it can be “absorbed into the mainstream media”?

Continue reading →

Commenting Policy

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.

You may use HTML in your comments. Feel free to review the full list of allowed HTML here.