Please allow me to backtrack a little on my latest column. In “Ahmed Mohamed: Just 14 and Already a Professional Islamo-Victim” I stated that I was not entirely convinced that the Texas teenager planned to bring a suspicious device to school as part of a deliberate self-victimization hoax. After reading more about the incident, I’m nearly certain that this kid knew exactly what he was doing.
I would not be surprised if he did this in coordination with the Council on American-Islamic Relations, or CAIR, the infamous Muslim “civil rights” group linked to several self-victimization hoaxes. We already know that CAIR is representing him; it’s only a question of whether they coordinated this beforehand.
What this kid was doing, very likely with the help of CAIR, is called desensitization. It’s the processes of conditioning people to ignore what they know to be dangerous. Most people, when they encounter a briefcase with protruding wires, will trust their instincts and report it to authorities. As the Department of Homeland Security used to advise, “If you see something, say something.” But if ordinary people can be made to keep mum out of fear that they will be called names — racist, Islamophobe, etc. — then terrorists can operate without nosy people flubbing up the operation.
Frontpage Magazine aptly coined a new adage for this era of tolerance and diversity: “If you see something, say something — unless the suspicious person is Muslim.” Yeah. Then shut up or you’re racist.
The classic desensitization operation is the “flying imams” incident of November 2006, in which a group of six Muslim clerics (imams) seemed to go out of their way to alarm passengers on a flight to Phoenix. Three of the imams also triggered “red flags” by buying only one-way tickets and not checking baggage. Several passengers quietly complained to flight attendants that they found the imams’ behavior suspicious.
The righteously indignant imams struck back with lawsuits against the airport, the airline and an anonymous passenger who passed a note to a flight attendant. The imams were represented by CAIR, of course. Eventually the suit against the passenger was dropped but the one against airline went to court. The case was eventually settled for an undisclosed amount through court-supervised mediation, which CAIR touted as a civil rights victory. The judge wrote that the imams had done nothing illegal and discarded as irrelevant the fact that reasonable people, lacking the benefit of hindsight, did what they thought prudent to keep people safe. Airlines were put on notice — if you see Muslims doing something that looks suspicious, you’d better be right.
Many observers, myself included, believed that the whole incident was a premeditated attempt to provoke exactly the reaction that they got — just like Ahmed Mohamed’s stunt. If you think that sounds crazy, consider for a moment that one of the imams worked for a Hamas front group before it was shuttered by the Treasury Department.
What CAIR will never admit is that people in western societies are socialized to treat Muslims with kid gloves. In their world, Muslims are given extra scrutiny. In reality, they are given less. In their world, the innocent actions of Muslims are interpreted as threatening by demented, Islamophobic minds. In reality, people pretend not to find their actions threatening even when they clearly are.
Can anyone dispute that the 2009 Fort Hood shooting could have been prevented if anyone had had the cajones to report Major Nidal Hassan before he started killing people? It didn’t take Sherlock Holmes to deduce that the Palestinian-American psychiatrist was hot for jihad. Major Hasan went off topic at a military psychiatry conference to deliver a lecture that many in the audience perceived as pro-radical Islam and anti-American, in which he approvingly quoted radical clerics and even Osama bin Laden. A classmate of his says that Hasan later mentioned his support for suicide bombers.
As someone who has served in the Army, I can tell you that career officers are some of the most risk-averse people you will ever meet because the worst fate they can imagine is having an Equal Opportunity (EO) complaint filed against them. There’s nothing worse than being accused of an “-ism” or a “-phobia.”
The 9/11 attacks might have been just a little less horrific if an airline employee in Portland, Maine had listened to his inner Islamophobe. Michael Tuohey, an employee of US Airways — the same airline that was later sued by the flying imams — was creeped out by two passengers at the check-in counter on that fine September morning. Their names were Mohamed Atta and Abdul Aziz al Omari. “Something in my stomach churned,” said Tuohey. “And subconsciously, I said to myself, ‘if they don’t look like Arab terrorists, nothing does’.” Then he gave himself a “mental slap.” “I said to myself, ‘that’s not nice to think. They are just two Arab businessmen’.”
Those “two Arab businessmen” later crashed a jumbo jet into the World Trade Center.
Our reluctance to identify Muslim malfeasance goes beyond terrorism. Try to imagine a society so paralyzed by fear of being labeled Islamophobic that people will look the other way while school-aged girls are raped. That nation really exists. It’s called England.
Between 1997 and 2013, a group of mostly Pakistani men in and around Rotherham, England were luring white English girls as young as eleven into what can only be called sex slavery. A conservative estimate of the victims is 1,400. The pervs managed to keep their little operation secret until 2001 when a Home Office worker named Jayne Senior began interviewing victims and compiling a report which she eventually turned over to authorities … who did nothing for fear of being perceived as racist. Ms. Senior was pressured to remain silent and even ordered to attend an “ethnicity and diversity course.” Since the Rotherham bust, other Muslim-operated sex slavery rings and other coverups have been discovered across England. They were smaller of course, but not small.
To make matters worse, one man was even arrested for talking openly about Muslim-operated sex slavery rings. His name is Nick Griffin and he’s probably one of the most hated men in the UK. Such is the fate of truth-tellers everywhere. Nick Griffin is the head of the British Nationalist Party (BNP), which is often described as crypto-fascist. According to the journalist Sean Thomas of the UK Telegraph:
As long ago as 2001, Nick Griffin … was making claims about Asian grooming gangs. In 2004 he repeated these allegations in a speech clandestinely recorded by the BBC for a TV documentary, Secret Agent. He was arrested and charged with inciting racial hatred.
Imagine the chilling effect that can have. If you don’t want to get arrested, you’ll keep your mouth shut. Only stupid old racists like Nick Griffin talk about Muslim-operated sex slavery rings.
Nick Griffin was telling the truth and we’d be well advised to follow his lead. This insane fear we have of offending Muslims is getting people killed — and raped. I don’t care for a moment if some kid in Texas feels bad because a teacher mistook his bomb-like object for a bomb. He was likely baiting the teacher, and even if he wasn’t, the teacher did nothing wrong. The madness has to stop.
Cross-posted at Patriot Update