Aha!: Climate hysteria leadership too white, male to ‘connect with public’

Aha!: Climate hysteria leadership too white, male to ‘connect with public’

[Ed. – So that‘s the problem.  Bonus point: This peculiar pattern is an interesting commentary on, well, white males.  Maybe it’s just the “flattest Bell curve on the planet” factor?]

Just the other day, the National Wildlife Federation announced its new president – a white male “whiz kid”. Last month, the Climate Reality Project, founded by Al Gore, replaced its female chief executive with a white man. Last November, the National Parks and Conservation Association replaced its veteran leader with another white male. The Union of Concerned Scientists is due to announce its new leader as early as next week. Spoiler alert: it’s not going to be a woman.

Public opinion research in the US suggests women, Latinos, African-Americans, Asians and Native Americans are more concerned – and more directly affected – by climate change than other populations. Doesn’t it make sense to include those who are most at risk in decisions about how we fight the defining challenge of our time?

Now take a look at the top executives at eight of the top 10 groups devoted to fighting that fight:

Trending: Facebook forbids mainstream political argument as ‘hate speech’

Sierra Club? White male.

Nature Conservancy? White male.

League of Conservation Voters? White male. …

The very top of “Big Green” is as white and male as a Tea Party meet-up. It doesn’t look like change. It doesn’t even look like America. So is it any wonder environmental groups are having trouble connecting with the public on climate change?

Continue reading →


For your convenience, you may leave commments below using Disqus. If Disqus is not appearing for you, please disable AdBlock to leave a comment.