Whatever data remain on Imran Awan’s smashed hard drives likely can be recovered

Whatever data remain on Imran Awan’s smashed hard drives likely can be recovered
Abid Awan, leaving court after a separate insurance fraud accusation. (Image: DCNF)

Whoever thought he had obliterated forever any damning facts and figures on the hard drives of Imran Awan’s computers has another think coming. Since recovering the drives from the home of Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz’s former information technology aide, the feds have sent the damaged disks out for assessment. They report that the odds of reading whatever was on those hard drives are excellent.

“It depends on what happens, but even if it is hit with a hammer, it probably doesn’t damage the platters that actually hold the data, which remains recoverable,” said Tom Hakim, engineering supervisor for werecoverdata.com, a New York-based lab that specializes in difficult digital retrieval.

“In most cases, it’s very likely” the information on a smashed hard drive can be recovered “in two or three days, maybe a week,” Hakim said.

His lab, which does extensive work for law enforcement and Fortune 500 corporations, has also recovered data from disks that were in fires and that had been submerged in water.

That may be very bad news for Pakistani-born Imran. He and his younger brothers Abid and Jamal, his wife Hina Alvi, and his best friend Rao Abbas are criminal suspects in a federal investigation first made public in February into abuse of the congressional IT servers, including the possible transfer of data, emails and files from the offices of dozens of House Democrats.

Imran had worked for Wasserman Schultz — who resigned in July 2016 as chairwoman of the Democratic National Committee after its IT system was hacked — since 2005. His relatives and friend had also worked on and off as IT aides, being paid collectively more than $4 million from 2009 to 2016.

All five of the suspects lost access to the congressional IT system in February, and all of them were removed from office payrolls except Hina who left the country in March. Wasserman Schultz fired Imran the day after his arrest but appeared prepared to keep paying him in Pakistan had he not been arrested.

In a related development Monday, the Foundation for Accountability and Civic Trust (FACT) filed an ethics complaint with Congress against Wasserman Schultz because she kept Imran on her official office payroll for months after his IT access was terminated. Moreover, other House Democrats fired Imran, along with his relatives and friends, while Wasserman Schultz continued employing Imran.

In a statement, Matthew Whitaker, FACT’s executive director, said:

There is something quite amiss as to why Congresswoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz continued to use taxpayer funds to employ former technology staff member, Imran Awan, even months after he was barred from accessing the House’s computer systems and a number of her colleagues severed ties with Awan.

Since Awan’s arrest last week, Wasserman Schultz has been evasive and unable to answer even basic questions about the nature of Awan’s employment with her office. This only further confirms the urgency of an investigation into her unethical and illegal actions.

Whitaker is a former U.S. attorney for the Southern District of Iowa.

Also on Monday, Florida GOP Rep. Ron DeSantis , a key member of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, called on lawmakers to assess the damage the IT vulnerabilities might have caused.

“Congress needs to know how this happened and what damage has been done. We have a responsibility to protect the House,” he said.

“The possibility that sensitive congressional information was compromised requires Congress to examine this matter,” the Florida Republican added.

DeSantis is chairman of the oversight panel’s subcommittee on national security and a member of its subcommittee on government operations.

This report, by Mark Tapscott, was cross posted by arrangement with the Daily Caller News Foundation.

LU Staff

LU Staff

Promoting and defending liberty, as defined by the nation’s founders, requires both facts and philosophical thought, transcending all elements of our culture, from partisan politics to social issues, the workings of government, and entertainment and off-duty interests. Liberty Unyielding is committed to bringing together voices that will fuel the flame of liberty, with a dialogue that is lively and informative.


Commenting Policy

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.

You may use HTML in your comments. Feel free to review the full list of allowed HTML here.