‘Terrorist’ is now a biased term. Journalists should stop using it.

‘Terrorist’ is now a biased term. Journalists should stop using it.
Image via Facebook

All available evidence suggests that when Micah Johnson sniped police officers in downtown Dallas on Thursday, he intended it as a political act.

During the ensuing standoff, he told police negotiators that he was angry about the recent apparently unwarranted killings of black men by police, and “stated he wanted to kill white people, especially white officers,” according to Dallas Police Chief David Brown.

Johnson could not have reasonably believed that he’d shoot enough cops to actually diminish the capacity of law enforcement agencies to unjustifiably kill black people. He did it to send a message, to arbitrarily terrorize cops in the way that he felt arbitrarily terrorized by them.

Am I arguing, then, that journalists (like me) should be calling Johnson a terrorist?

No, even though I think the dictionary definition of that word clearly applies to him.

I think the fact that almost nobody is calling Johnson a terrorist —like almost nobody called Dylann Roof (the Charleston, South Carolina, church shooter) or the Oregon wildlife refuge occupiers terrorists — demonstrates how uselessly arbitrary and loaded that word has become, and I think it’s time for journalists to stop parroting it uncritically….

Continue reading →


Commenting Policy

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.

You may use HTML in your comments. Feel free to review the full list of allowed HTML here.