Do we want Saudi farmland ownership to be an issue for U.S. water-rights politics?

Do we want Saudi farmland ownership to be an issue for U.S. water-rights politics?
(Image: Shutterstock)

[Ed. – That’s a serious question, because ready or not, here it comes.  The Saudis aren’t the only foreign agriculturalists putting down roots in the U.S., for that matter.  Watch out: the unpopularity of foreign farmland owners may cause many Americans to sell out a water-rights seniority principle that protects American farmers.  Don’t fall for a stupid debate on this question.]

Saudi Arabia’s largest dairy company will soon be unable to farm alfalfa in its own parched country to feed its 170,000 cows. So it’s turning to an unlikely place to grow the water-chugging crop — the drought-stricken American Southwest.

Almarai Co. bought land in January that roughly doubled its holdings in California’s Palo Verde Valley, an area that enjoys first dibs on water from the Colorado River. The company also acquired a large tract near Vicksburg, Arizona, becoming a powerful economic force in a region that has fewer well-pumping restrictions than other parts of the state.

The purchases totaling about 14,000 acres enable the Saudis to take advantage of farm-friendly U.S. water laws. The acquisitions have also rekindled debate over whether a patchwork of regulations and court rulings in the West favors farmers too heavily, especially those who grow thirsty, low-profit crops such as alfalfa at a time when cities are urging people to take shorter showers, skip car washes and tear out grass lawns.

Continue reading →


Commenting Policy

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.

You may use HTML in your comments. Feel free to review the full list of allowed HTML here.