California’s Prop. 1 water bond is a big fat lie

California’s Prop. 1 water bond is a big fat lie

[Ed. – Voters are being duped.  This bond is for money to manipulate the “ecosystem.”  It’s not for money to build new reservoirs.  Emphasis added.]

The $7.5 billion California Proposition 1 Water Bond (Assembly Bill 1471, “Water Quality, Supply, and Infrastructure Improvement Act of 2014”) on the November ballot promises to provide more above ground water storage for the first time in 40 years in order to gain a broad support from Democrats and Republicans.  But a close look at the language in the proposition reveals that the initiative is another legislative “bait and switch” that will not complete a single major water storage or delivery system.

According to Bruce Colbert, Executive Director of the Property Owners Association of Riverside County, Proposition 1 limits to $2.7 billion the portion of the bond that is supposedly earmarked for “public benefit” from water storage projects, including dams, reservoirs, and groundwater storage.  The “public benefit” is then defined as ecosystem improvements, water quality, flood control, or recreation.

The language of the proposition then limits “public benefit” cost share of a water storage project to “not exceed 50 percent of the total costs” of the project. And the language further states that ecosystem improvements must comprise at least 50 percent of the total public benefits of a project.

In other words, the Water Bond only funds a quarter of the cost to construct any above or below ground water storage. To finish any project will require higher taxes or user fees to pay for the other 75% of any water storage project’s costs. …

[T]he text of the Water Bond also states, “A project shall not be funded…unless it provides measurable improvements to the Delta ecosystem or to the tributaries to the Delta.”  Therefore, key decisions on funding would be made by Governor Jerry Brown’s politically appointed California Water Commission (AB 1471).

Consequently, the Water Bond provides no immediate relief for the state’s water woes.

Continue reading →


Commenting Policy

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.

You may use HTML in your comments. Feel free to review the full list of allowed HTML here.