U.S. on way to becoming banana republic because of McCutcheon ruling

U.S. on way to becoming banana republic because of McCutcheon  ruling

Many analysts have written a lot about the decision, with a natural focus on its direct implications for campaigns. Those are huge and important. But they are, I believe, overshadowed by the impact of the decision on corruption in America.

[…]

Some have suggested that McCutcheon was not a terribly consequential decision—that it did not really end individual contribution limits, that it was a minor adjustment post-Citizens United.Others have said that it may have a silver lining: more money to parties, more of the money disclosed. I disagree on both counts. Justice Breyer’s penetrating dissent to the decision pointed out the many methods that campaigns, parties, and their lawyers would use to launder huge contributions in ways that would make a mockery of individual limits. Chief Justice Roberts pooh-poohed them as fanciful. And, of course, they started to emerge the day after the decision.

As for disclosure, the huge amounts that will now flow in through political parties will be channeled through joint committees, state and local party committees, and others in complex ways that will make real disclosure immensely difficult, if not impossible.

Continue reading →


Commenting Policy

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse. Read more.

You may use HTML in your comments. Feel free to review the full list of allowed HTML here.

Facebook Comments

Disqus Comments