The problem with Common Core’s lesson plan on the Gettysburg Address

The problem with Common Core’s lesson plan on the Gettysburg Address

Rotten appleThe Common Core State Standards Initiative, which grew out of the 1990s “accountability movement” in education, has taken a lot of heat from critics on the right for its promotion of liberal agenda — a trait that hardly distinguishes it from most other educational initiatives to come down the pike in recent decades, with their emphasis on diversity, multiculturalism, and the like.

One facet of Common Core that gets far less attention is its emphasis on teaching young people to think outside the box. As I wrote here, there is some merit to that goal that is often lost in the widespread condemnation of the endeavor as a whole.

But equipping students with the capacity to “think critically” is effective only when you give them something to think critically about. That constructing lesson plans that do that is easier said than done is evident from a report at BizPac Review, which focuses on a teaching strand on the Gettysburg Address.

The lesson allegedly trades on a method known as close reading. Borrowed from the field of literary criticism, close reading entails directing the reader’s attention to individual words, syntax, and the ordering of sentences and ideas. Student Achievement Partners, the creators of the Common Core standards, seem to think it means reading without appeal to context. Here is part of their lesson plan designed for students in Grade 9:

The idea here is to plunge students into an independent encounter with this short text. Refrain from giving background context or substantial instructional guidance at the outset. It may make sense to notify students that the short text is thought to be difficult and they are not expected to understand it fully on a first reading — that they can expect to struggle. Some students may be frustrated, but all students need practice in doing their best to stay with something they do not initially understand. This close reading approach forces students to rely exclusively on the text instead of privileging background knowledge, and levels the playing field for all students as they seek to comprehend Lincoln’s address.

Having students attempt to make sense Lincoln’s words outside of the context of the Civil War — and especially the Battle of Gettysburg — is akin to having students read “The Grapes of Wrath” beginning with Chapter 14. In both cases, the “privilege” of background knowledge is indispensable to making sense of the text and homing in on the author’s reasons for writing it.

In the video below, Jim Stergios, executive director of the Pioneer Institute, which is critical of Common Core, speaks out on “Fox & Friends.”

Related Articles

Follow me on Twitter or join me at Facebook.


Howard Portnoy

Howard Portnoy

Howard Portnoy has written for The Blaze, HotAir, NewsBusters, Weasel Zippers, Conservative Firing Line, RedCounty, and New York’s Daily News. He has one published novel, Hot Rain, (G. P. Putnam’s Sons), and has been a guest on Radio Vice Online with Jim Vicevich, The Alana Burke Show, Smart Life with Dr. Gina, and The George Espenlaub Show.

Commenting Policy

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse. Read more.

You may use HTML in your comments. Feel free to review the full list of allowed HTML here.

Facebook Comments

Disqus Comments