Quantcast
The natural progress of things is for liberty to yield and government to gain ground. —THOMAS JEFFERSON, 1788

Who’s ready for gender-neutral pronouns?

Politically correctHow’s that rule go again? Oh, yes: It’s i after e, but ze before ou. If you’re unfamiliar with ze and ou, it’s probably because you aren’t enrolled at Mills College in Oakland, Calif. (aka, Vassar of the West), which is attempting to change English by force.

The Associated Press (via CNSNews) notes that selected students at the school, which admits only women, want to replace the current crop of personal pronouns with variants that better accommodate the needs of those students who do not think of themselves as females.

The weekly meetings of Mouthing Off!, a group for students … who identify as gay, lesbian, bisexual or transgender, always start the same way. Members take turns going around the room saying their names and the personal pronouns they want others to use when referring to them — she, he or something else.

[I]ncreasingly, the ‘shes’ and ‘hers’ that dominate the introductions are keeping third-person company with ‘they,’ ”ze’ and other neutral alternatives meant to convey a more generous notion of gender.

Skylar Crownover, president of Mouthing Off!, is quoted as saying, “Because I go to an all-women’s college, a lot of people are like, ‘If you don’t identify as a woman, how did you get in?’ I just tell them the application asks you to mark your sex and I did. It didn’t ask me for my gender.”

Crownover represents a reportedly growing segment of the population that chooses to self-identify as “genderqueer” — neither male nor female but an androgynous hybrid or rejection of both. Others prefer agender, bigender, third gender, or gender-fluid.

Since everything needs a name (Linguistics 101), English need to distinguish among these brave new categories. Hence, ze, sie, e, ou, and ve. The AP writer doesn’t specify what these curiosities are meant to signify, but seriously, how much do you care?

The article does note that neologisms like ze have begun to find their way into students’ academic papers, and not just at Mills but at institutions of higher learning as far away as Connecticut.

And how are they being received by faculty? Lucy Ferris, a writer-in-residence at Trinity College, in the Nutmeg State, is quoted thus:

There is an initial discomfort. I think it’s probably hypocritical to pretend there isn’t, to say, ’Ok, that’s what they want to do’ and leave it at that. The people I know who teach will say ‘This is weird and it’s cumbersome and it’s not going to last because it’s not organic.’

So does Ferris believe students should avoid using nonsense words? Not entirely.

Mail carrier did not evolve organically and it’s a lot easier to say mailman. Decades ago there were poets who refused to be called poetesses. Most language has evolved organically, but there have been times — and when it comes to issues of gender there probably have to be times — when there are people willing to push the envelope.

Ferris doesn’t elaborate on how mail carrier is easier to say than mailman, but don’t expect to see ze, sie, e, ou, and ve in the dictionary until blooffgherbxvs can fly. Blooffgherbxvs is our word replacement for pigs, which carries negative connotations.

Posting Policy
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse. Read more.
You may use HTML in your comments. Feel free to review the full list of allowed HTML here.
  • http://gravatar.com/geoffreybritain Geoffrey Britain

    “Skylar Crownover, president of Mouthing Off!, is quoted as saying, “Because I go to an all-women’s college, a lot of people are like, ‘If you don’t identify as a woman, how did you get in?’ I just tell them the application asks you to mark your sex and I did. It didn’t ask me for my gender.””

    Ms Crownover’s admission that her sex is female but that she wishes to separate her biological sex from her ‘gender’ is another sad example of an inability to accept reality.

    But there already is a perfectly good, ‘organic’ and appropriate gender-neutral pronoun; “it”.

  • Night Owl

    I am glad I’m getting old. I don’t have to care about stuff like this. I can’t imagine the amount of time someone must have on their hands to even think this stuff up and develop it into a “thing” they get together to discuss.

  • Gal Spunes

    This is what happens when stupid, lazy children are mollycoddled and sheltered from reality. They have to invent this kind of drivel to fill the vast, pointless void of their lives.

    I actually pity them.