DOMA looking doomed

DOMA looking doomed
Edith Windsor
Edith Windsor

The growing sense of today’s oral arguments before the Supreme Court in United States v. Windsor is that the majority of justices are leaning toward declaring unconstitutional the Defense of Marriage Act’s definition of marriage as limited to one man and one woman.

The justices spent the first half of Wednesday’s session discussing whether the court had jurisdiction to hear the case. Few justices, however, showed any discomfort with deciding the underlying constitutional questions raised by the case. Significantly, Justice Anthony Kennedy appeared ready to side with the court’s liberal faction.

Edith Windsor, the complainant, was not the first to challenge the law, but her case was the one the justices elected to review. It was one of two that led Attorney General Eric Holder to announce on Feb. 23, 2011 that he and the president had determined that Section 3 of DOMA was unconstitutional and, accordingly, the administration would no longer be defending DOMA in court challenges.

Windsor told BuzzFeed earlier this year:

The idea that I might be a piece of history blows my mind. I think it’s kind of wonderful that I’m getting my chance to really ask for justice, and I suspect I’ll get it.

It is beginning to look as though she might be right.

Related Articles

Follow me on Twitter or join me at Facebook.

Howard Portnoy

Howard Portnoy

Howard Portnoy has written for The Blaze, HotAir, NewsBusters, Weasel Zippers, Conservative Firing Line, RedCounty, and New York’s Daily News. He has one published novel, Hot Rain, (G. P. Putnam’s Sons), and has been a guest on Radio Vice Online with Jim Vicevich, The Alana Burke Show, Smart Life with Dr. Gina, and The George Espenlaub Show.

Commenting Policy

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse. Read more.

You may use HTML in your comments. Feel free to review the full list of allowed HTML here.

Facebook Comments

Disqus Comments