Only in DC is it bad to slow gov’t spending

Only in DC is it bad to slow gov’t spending

Everybody seems to hate the across-the-board government spending cuts due to kick in March 1.

President Barack Obama called the cuts—known in Washington as the “sequester”—a “meat-cleaver approach” to trimming the government’s annual deficits, warning that they will visit a host of plagues upon America: Military readiness will suffer. School quality will decline. Hundreds of thousands of people will lose their jobs.

Obama didn’t mention one other thing the sequester might accomplish: restoring faith in America’s creditworthiness.

With everybody in Washington bad-mouthing the sequester, you might think it was imposed on the United States by a dreaded enemy. In reality, the sequester is the government’s own doing. Back in 2011, Obama and his Republican adversaries in Congress agreed that deep spending cuts, totaling about $110 billion a year for nine years, would go into effect in 2013 if they didn’t come up with a better way to start paying down the $16.5 trillion national debt. They didn’t, so the sequester looms.

Continue reading.


Commenting Policy

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse. Read more.

You may use HTML in your comments. Feel free to review the full list of allowed HTML here.

Facebook Comments

Disqus Comments